In the religious tradition I grew up in,
baptism was something you did when you were old enough to make a voluntary
confession of faith on your own. More to the point, baptism was just that -- it
was a sort of public confession that "I have decided to follow Jesus, no turning
back." There was nothing particularly mystical about baptism; it was taking a
bath to let people know you love Jesus.
My present conviction, however,
is that baptism actually involves much more than that. I think a sort of super
minimalist conception of baptism such as the one I grew up hearing is certainly
true, as far as it goes, but it doesn't say enough. Baptism is a greater and
more profound mystery than that!
Consider what Paul says in Romans 6, the
most sophisticated and detailed discussion of baptism in his letters. It opens
with the question: What then are we to say? Should we continue in sin in
order that grace may abound? (v. 1). Why should he begin with this question?
What might motivate this line of reasoning? The answer is that in Paul's
theology, God is very unfair; when people sin, rather than responding in terms
of equal and proportionate punishment for the sin, he provides grace and
salvation! This God shows his love for us by dying for us while we are still
sinners (5.8); God reconciles us to himself while we were enemies (5.10).
When despicable sinners turn their backs to God and go off on their own way, his
response, rather than destroying them or leaving them to be fall apart as a
natural consequence of sin, is to restore them and reconcile them. In a word,
where sin increased, grace abounded all the more (5.20). But if sin does
not get its comeuppance with God, why then should we be holy? How do we motivate
holiness with a gracious God?
The answer Paul gives has to do with
baptism. His answer is that we do not go on living in sin because we have died
to it, and more specifically that this death to sin has taken place during our
baptism (6.2-3). Now this is very profound! What he is saying is that through
baptism, our fundamental mode of being is entirely changed: whereas previously
Paul says that all, both Jews and Greeks, are under the power of
sin (3.9), now he says that we Christians who have been baptized are dead
to sin, and that this has been accomplished through baptism. This inspires
further research; how can something so simple as baptism free us from the power
of sin?
When we look more closely at Paul's reasoning, we find that
baptism for him has to do with union with Christ. Notice the language he
uses:
. . . all of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus were
baptized into his death. (v. 3)
. . . we have been buried
with him by baptism into death . . . (v. 4)
. . . we have
been united with him in a death like his . . . (v. 5)
. . .
we have died with Christ . . . (v. 8)
. . . consider
yourselves dead to sin and alive to God in Jesus Christ. (v.
11)
Paul's reasoning appears to my mind to be this. God is gracious, but
that does not provide us with motive to sin. On the contrary, we are not to sin
because we have died to sin; we have undergone a fundamental change with regards
to our identities, with regard to our state of being. This has been accomplished
through baptism, because in baptism we were united to Christ, who died and was
resurrected.
Now if we are freed from sin because of our union with
Christ, this must be because Christ himself is freed from sin. Indeed, this
narrative is behind Paul's reasoning. Notice what he says:
We know
that our old self was crucified with him so that the body of sin might be
destroyed, and we might no longer be enslaved to sin. For whoever has died is
freed from sin. But if we have died with Christ, we believe that we will also
live with him. We know that Christ, begin raised from the dead, will never die
again; death no longer has dominion over him. The death he died, he died to sin,
once for all; but the life he lives, he lives to God. So you also must consider
yourselves dead to sin and alive to God in Christ Jesus (vv.
6-11).
Here the NRSV's choices of translation leave a bit to be desired.
What they translate here as "our old self" (ὁ παλαιὸς ἡμῶν ἄνθρωπος, v. 6) I
would sooner translate as "our old humanity." The idea is that Christ took upon
himself a human nature such as our own, fallen and subject to sin and destined
for death, the same as us. Torrance emphasizes this point, but so do Athanasius
and Gregory Nazianzen. He takes our condition upon himself in order to redeem,
sanctify, purify, and deify it! This is precisely what he does, ultimately
through his death.
Here, too, the NRSV translators disappoint. The
literal reading of v. 7 is: the one who died (ὁ ἀποθανών) is freed
from sin. Campbell, by my lights, is right to read this as a reference to
Christ, who died and therefore was freed from the power of sin in his human
nature. This is exactly what Paul goes on to say later: The death he died, he
died to sin, once for all (v. 10). Paul understands Christ at one point to
have been under sin in some sense, the same as the rest of us; he doesn't
suppose that Christ committed sin, of course, but merely that Christ's
human nature had the "sin disease," so to speak -- that it was inclined in the
wrong direction, same as the rest of us. Through his death, Christ was freed
from this power, and in his resurrection he was given life to live for God
forever.
Therefore, when we are baptized, we are united with Christ who
is beyond the power of sin! Just as he has died to sin forever and lives to God,
when we are baptized, we are to consider ourselves to be the same, since we are
one with him. So Paul tells us: you also must consider yourselves dead to sin
and alive to God in Christ Jesus (v. 11).
So baptism, for Paul, is
far more than a mere public declaration that "I have decided to follow Jesus, no
turning back." No, it is the way that we are liberated from the powers of sin
through union with Christ!
No comments :
Post a Comment