The church can only be the conduit of God’s
love if it stops judging others (See yesterday’s post). This means that it will
stop being concerned about its reputation in the eyes of those who practice
this religious judgment. The only reputation we need be concerned with is to
have the one Jesus had. He was known for his unprecedented love, by those who
would receive it, and scorned for his irreligious attitudes, by those who would
not.
Jesus’ religious reputation was tarnished
in the eyes of religious people because he did not honor many of the religious
taboos of his day. Walking in unity with the Father, Jesus possessed a joyful
freedom—a kind of recklessness—that was scandalous to those whose worth was
derived from their supposed ability to judge good and evil. Jesus hung out with
women, some of whom had tarnished reputations. He fellowshipped with tax
collectors, drunkards, and other sinners. He healed and fellowshipped with
lepers. He praised Gentiles, Samaritans, and even prostitutes and tax
collectors over respected Jewish religious leaders.
Among the religious, Jesus’ reputation was
dishonorable. But Jesus wasn’t concerned about his reputation. Jesus came to
heal the sick, not to placate the religious sensibilities of those who thought
they were healthy (Mark 2:17). To heal the sick, you have to love the sick. And
this means you have to ignore what those who (mistakenly) think they’re healthy
think about you!
The singular task of the church is to
replicate this eternal, reckless love to the world. One indication that we are
doing our job well is that sinners on the fringes of society will be enjoying
fellowship with us, as they did with Jesus. Another indication, directly
resulting from this, is that those who judge by religious standards (they eat
from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil) will judge us.
If, for example, a church treats the LGBT
community with the same compassion religious judges extend toward divorced
folks or people who struggle with weight issues, its leaders will likely be
condemned as “compromising the Word of God” by these judges. Such a church is
sinning against the (self-serving) knowledge of good and evil from which the
religious judges feed. Consequently, the judges will likely feel as though
their god has been assaulted, and, as a matter a fact, it has! As idolatrous
people often do when their gods are threatened, they may rage. They did so with
Jesus, and they will do so today when a church looks like Jesus.
A church that celebrates the cessation of
judgment and loves as God loves has to be willing to have their reckless love
scorned as compromising, relativistic, liberal, soft on doctrine, or
antireligious. After all, what kind of church attracts and embraces
prostitutes, drunkards, gays, and drug addicts? What kind of church routinely
has smokers, drinkers, gamblers, and bums ushering in their services, hanging
out in their small groups, singing in their choir, signing up for classes,
etc.—without anyone immediately confronting their sin? What kind of church
would accept a woman who was still living with a man out of wedlock after
having gone through five marriages? (See John 4:1-26). What kind of church
blurs the boundary between those who are “in” and those who are “out” to this
degree?
The answer is a Jesus kind of church.
—Adapted from Repenting of Religion, pages 196-198.
No comments :
Post a Comment