Why was the forbidden tree in the center of the garden called The Tree of
the Knowledge of Good and Evil? Since the Bible depicts eating from this
tree as the reason humans are estranged from God and the cause of all that’s
wrong with humanity, eating from this tree is obviously a terrible thing. But
what’s so terrible about acquiring “knowledge of good and evil?” Why wouldn’t
God want Adam and Eve to possess this knowledge?
The Hebrew concept of “knowledge” used here goes much deeper than mere
intellectual knowledge. Rather, the concept of “the knowledge of good and evil”
connotes an attempt by humans to define and experience good and evil on their
own—apart from God. Eating from this tree represents a rebellion against God,
for we are aspiring to be “wise like God” in the sense of grasping for moral
autonomy—an exercise of sovereignty that is appropriate to God alone.
This is exactly what the serpent tempted Eve with. “[W]hen you eat of it,” he
said, “your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and
evil” (Gen 3:5). Eating from the forbidden tree represents our rebellious
attempts to position ourselves as judges rather than leaving all judgment to
God, as the bible consistently commands (e.g. Rom 14:10; James 4:11-12).
By eating from the forbidden tree, Eve was guilty of idolatry. Accepting the
serpent’s false and untrustworthy depiction of God, Eve stopped trusting God to
be her source of life and instead turned to the forbidden tree as a new source
of life. This is idolatry.
Such idolatry causes us to define and experience as “good” all that gives us
a sense of life. Conversely, everything that threatens our idolatrous sources of
life is instinctively defined and experienced as “evil.” In other words, our
idolatrous hunger unconsciously creates its own version of the Tree of the
Knowledge of Good and Evil. We habitually see and experience the entire
world through a filter of our self-serving judgments of good and evil.
The love that reflects the reign of God ascribes worth to others, at cost
to oneself. In direct opposition to this, the judgment that reflects
rebellion against God ascribes worth to oneself, at cost to others, and in
rebellion against God’s own determination. Judgment, in other words, is
the direct antithesis of agape love.
Put simply: We can’t possibly ascribe unsurpassable worth to others at cost
to ourselves, while at the same time detracting worth from others to ascribe
worth to ourselves.
Judgment is the antithesis of the kind of love that God always intended
humans to receive and express to one another. It’s the antithesis of the kind of
love that expresses God’s life and therefore the life of the kingdom.
I’m convinced this is why the Bible teaches that the Tree of the
Knowledge of Good and Evil was placed in the center of the garden with the
Tree of Life. Life as God intends it revolves around trusting God for
his provision while obediently honoring God’s prohibition. This means we are to
trust God’s provision of life while honoring God’s prohibition against judgment.
And we cannot trust God’s provision of life while we participate in
judgment.
The forbidden tree wasn’t some arbitrary test God put in the garden to tempt
Adam and Eve. We should rather think of it as a sort of “No Trespassing” sign
God lovingly gave to his first children. God was, in effect, teaching them—and
us as well—that for life to be lived the way he intended it, for our life to
manifest the beautiful kingdom of God, we must never think we can define and
experience good and evil apart from him. When we try to do this, we are no
longer trusting him for life and we immediately lose our capacity to receive his
life and thus love like he loves.
The moment we become judgers, we stop being lovers. The moment we eat from
the forbidden tree, we’re blocked from access to the Tree of Life (Gen
3:22-24).
No comments :
Post a Comment