Sinful Nature and
Free Will
Q: If our sinful nature is what causes us
to sin/reject God, can we be held responsible for our sins, when this nature
resulted from Adam and Eve’s sin? Do we really have the freedom to either
choose/reject God if our sinful nature compels us to reject God?
On the other hand, if our sinful nature only influences, but does not cause
us to sin, wouldn’t that mean that it is theoretically possible, however
improbable, to choose to live a completely sinless life (because of the free
will that we have)? How come every single human being that has ever lived will
use the freedom that they have to go “that way” instead of “this way”?
Lastly, correct me if I’m wrong, but Scripture seems to suggest that if any
of us were in Adam and Eve’s place, we would have chosen to do the same thing
and eat of the forbidden fruit. However, if that was the case, did we really
have free will to go “this way or that way”, when it seems impossible for any of
us to have chosen not to eat the fruit?
A: Here are three considerations regarding “sinful nature” and our free
will:
1) I do think it is theoretically possible for an individual to live a
sinless life. Yet, this isn’t inconsistent with admitting that every one will
inevitably sin. Think of it like this. Every car crash (let us assume) is
preventable, if only drivers were more careful. Hence, it is theoretically
possible that there will be no car crashes any where on the earth today — or
this month — or this year — or ever. But it is certain there
will be car crashes, for which drivers are responsible. The thing is,
statistical certainty doesn’t negate individual responsibility. We are
responsible for every sin we commit, for we didn’t need to do it. We could have
done otherwise. It’s theoretically possible to go the rest of our lives without
sinning. Yet, it’s certain that, over our lifetime of decisions, we will
sin.
2) I see “original sin” as a) our being born screwed up in a myriad of ways,
including spiritually; and b) being born in a screwed up world that is oppressed
with fallen powers. This doesn’t make us sin, for sin is only sin if we
could do otherwise. Yet, it does render it certain that we will
eventually sin (see above). This is, in part, why we need a savior.
3) Finally, it’s important that we not think about this only in
individualistic terms. From a biblical perspective (and now, with much
confirmation from science), the human community is, in a sense,
one person, extending back to Adam. We influence each other, and are
responsible, in varying degrees, for one another. So we have
collectively gotten ourselves into a situation where we can’t avoid
sin, and the responsibility is shared by all of us. This is what Paul means
when he says we were in Adam. Yet, we are now placed in
Christ — all of us (I Cor. 15:22; Rom 5:14-20). It’s just that we all
(including believers) tend to see ourselves and our world as though we were
yet in Adam. Transitioning from Adam-thought to
Christ-thought is what discipleship is all about.
Greg Boyd
No comments :
Post a Comment