Adam
and Eve’s story is not just a “once upon a time” story; it is also the story of
every human being. The beginning of all sin—the origin of all that is
unloving—is a judgment about God. We embrace a picture of God that is less
loving, less beautiful, less full of life, less gracious, and less glorious
than the true God really is. From this, everything that attaches to sin, everything
that characterizes life “in Adam” (1 Cor. 15:22) and life in “the flesh” (Rom.
7:5; 8:4–8) follows. When our picture of God is distorted, we can no longer
trust God to be the source of our life. It is impossible to live in God’s love
if we don’t believe God is love.
This
deceptive picture of God in turn leads to sinful, idolatrous behavior. As we
have seen, we are created with a nonnegotiable need for the love, worth,
significance, and companionship that only the true God can provide. We are created
to have the perfect, triune love (that God is) poured into us and flow through
us. This is the abundant life we were created to enjoy and which the Enemy
wants to steal and destroy (John 10:10). If the deceiving Accuser is successful
in distorting our mental picture of God so that God appears incapable or
unwilling to give us life, we invariably look elsewhere to find life, and the
abundant life God alone can give us is lost.
We
might say that, under the power of a judgment about God, the need-based “homing
device” that was intended to drive us to God now drives us to try to fill the
God-shaped vacuum in our hearts with other things. Like a starving man
imprisoned in a dungeon for whom insects begin to look tantalizing after a
while, our hunger for God begins to give other things the illusory appearance
of being viable candidates for filling the hole in our soul.
Believing
the serpent’s lie, Eve “saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was a
delight to the eyes, and that the tree was to be desired to make one wise”
(Gen. 3:6). Undoubtedly the tree would not have seemed so desirable if Eve had
been viewing things accurately. If she had remained yielded to God rather than
believing the serpent’s accusation about God, the prospect of disobeying God
and eating from the forbidden tree—of going beyond the “No Trespassing”
sign—would not have been appealing to her. If she had viewed the tree with a
full soul rather than a hungry one, she wouldn't have seen it as “good for
food,” a “delight to the eyes,” and “desired to make one wise” (Gen. 3:6). It
was only because she was seeing the tree through the filter of her judgment and
consequent emptiness that she saw something this life-destroying as
life-supplying. In her new perception, violating God’s “No Trespassing” sign
seemed to offer her something she did not have.
No comments :
Post a Comment